Sony movie studio platinum 12 serial number GO my site to Download sony movie studio platinum 12 keygen sony vegas movie studio hd 12 ser. If I helped you please press like button! Winrar download: Sony Vegas Movie Studio HD Platinum 12 download: http://www.med.
Nero 12 is a multimedia software suite that lets you capture, convert and consume your movies, music and photos for the best home entertainment experience. Nero 12 was built to support Windows 8 and is optimized for widescreen (16:9 and 16:10) displays. Unlike other multimedia suites that are loosely connected, with Nero 12 it is fast and easy to achieve the results you want by working seamlessly across the applications in the suite. Nero 12 supports the latest video formats and has everything you need to convert, edit, burn, stream and enjoy your movies, music and photos.
Sony Creative Software's new consumer level Video Editing software is now called Movie Studio Platinum 12.Special Update January 2014.The latest range of Sony Movie Studio software is now released. Please follow these links to read new reviews:New Name ChangeThis new version which was released in the first half of August 2012, now replaces what we knew as 'Sony Vegas Movie Studio HD Platinum 11' or 'Sony Vegas Movie Studio HD Platinum 11 Production Suite'. So the names have been given some Zen treatment with the removal of 'Vegas' and 'HD' out of the title of the core program, and 'Production' has been also been dropped from the Suite version. 50 Sony Sound Series Production Music filesThese royalty-free soundtracks add the perfect atmosphere to almost any project.Follow along with Show Me How tutorials and learn as you go.Select from 50 Sony Sound Series: Production Music filesHi Derek, Thank you for your tutorials I have found them very informative. I would be very grateful for your help please.I have this version but can not find the aforementioned music files. They do not appear to be on the discs or connected to the paperwork suggesting a link.Do you have any ideas?
Derek:Just want to visit this one last time. Please comment on the post at the following link.I currently use a GT620 with an AMD quad core processor and SV Platinum 10.
I want to get a graphics card soon to update my rig along with Platinum 13. Both the R9 270 and the GTX 750Ti are within budget. My main concern is rendering time from my edited video to MC or Sony AVC, MP4, etc.My files are huge (up to 3 hrs edited), so I want to cut down on my rendering (transcoding?) time significantly. The timeline playback with the current GT620 card is ok for me. I prefer to use MC for BluRay because, although the files are larger and the processing is slower than Sony, the resulting videos are smoother with fewer artifacts.From what I am seeing, the R7 290 will not help me with rendering according to the comments and your article in this tutorial (unless I misunderstood). I also want to start doing color correction in DaVincci with 10-bit 4:2:2 colour space, so I would like the card to be able to support this.Looks like the HD5870 would solve the problem, but those are still price. Is the GTX 7XX the way to go?
Please comment. None of the newest graphics cards from AMD or Nvidia are supported for Mainconcept AVC rendering/exporting. The owners of this codec have not updated their code for a long time and I guess they never will. So buying an R9-270 will be of little use to you, if you mainly want to use the MC encoder.If you are simply upgrading an existing/older computer system, my very strong suggestion is that instead of wasting money for very little return on a brand new card, you instead buy a b2nd hand/b bGTX560/b or bGTX460/b from eBay. The older Nvidia GTX400 and GTX500 series graphics cards work exceedingly well with Vegas and rendering with Mainconcept AVC.I am still using an Nvidia GTX460 in my own computer and use it all the time for rendering to Mainconcept AVC - it works very, very well and definitely renders faster than my over-clocked Intel i7-2600k.There is a wide selection on 2nd hand Nvidia graphics cards for sale on eBay.
The main reason why most people are selling their cards on eBay, is because they are probably Gamers and are continually looking for the latest and best GPU. Support for MC Encoding ended when Nivida released the GTX600 series and above. Anyone who owns a GTX500 series card and uses Vegas, reports excellent performance.With the release of Nvidia's GTX600 series, they ended proper support for Video Editing programs by deliberately crippling the Drivers. GTX600, 700, 900.are aimed at Gamers only now! Nvidia's logic is that if you are a Video Editor, you should be using their professional Quadro cards which DO come with excellent Drivers that support Video Editing programs.
Big problem with Qaudro is they are terribly over-priced.Moving forward into the future, Sony now works much more closely with AMD Graphics Cards, because they have better drivers for Video Editing generally. However, ALL brands DO NOT support the MC encoder any more for video rendering. Hi thereYour Graphics Card is only a low powered GPU, so it is not going to speed up your rendering times.
Nvidia is useless now. I would not recommend for anyone.However, if you can find a 2nd hand GTX500 series on eBay like a GTX560 or GTX580, that will run like a rocket. All the older series Nvidia cards ibdo w/iork/b very well.When I talk about AMD, I am referring to the Chipset, not the manufacturer of actual card. Any brand is OK for AMD based GPUs.The higher end of the R7 cards is OK, like R7 260 or R7 260X.However I always believe it is better to save up for a little extra time and get the best you can afford.I explain what the problem is with Graphics Cards in this article.Scroll to section 006 and the pink section.url. Thanks for the info. It aligns with whatI have been reading online.
I plan to get MS 13 soon. I want to get a card that good compromise between cost and performance.I see the Nvidia GTX 560/Ti cards online for $150, which is within budget. However, the AnandTech benchmarks clearly show that the AMD cards are far superior. Although, I could not find the details of the benchmark setup. The only concern about the Radeon card is that some reports on Creative Cow indicate that the HD 6000/7000 series do not benefit Main Concepts AVC rendering. I would like a card that both Main Concepts and Sony AVC renderng will benefit from.The Radeon HD5000 series apparently work with both, so it would make sense to get something like the HD5770, but that is older technology. I would prefer to get something newer, but don't want to run the risk of getting a new card that does not support both Main Concepts and Sony AVC.
Perhaps you could share your thoughts and experience on this. None of the newer Nvidia or AMD GPUs work with Mainconcept AVC/AAC GPU rendering anymore. The H.264 Codec which is Mainconcept is very old now.
The company that owns Mainconcept is responsible for this. They own the code and are not updating how it works with the newest architecture in graphics cards. This is why the older GTX500 series are so good - they work under all conditions. I have a GTX460 and it renders video using CUDA very fast.You can go round and round in circles with this topic.You will not find a win/win situation - it does not exist.Everything I know from doing months and months of research is in the article that I told you to read. I have been looking at this for a while too and it is indeed a circuitous problem. However, as I said, I am not looking for a win/win, just a best compromise. My experience using Platinum 10 is that the Main Concepts codec gives better results (smoother video) than Sony in certain situations -particularly where there is a lot of movement and things like cobblestone with movement.
However, the rendering is way longer and the files are larger. I don't know if this has been improved in MS 13 (can't test because it won't run on my current Win XP setup), but I still have to consider Main Concepts in my final decision.So, it seems that the best compromise would be to use and older Nvidia GTX 4xx/5xx/6xx or Radeon HD 5000/6000/7000 series card. Just wanted to verify where the Main Concepts GPU support stops for either series. I found an article for Sony GPU support, but not Main Concepts. Hi RandellSo I guess you have been using the B'Upload to YouTube/B button inside Movie Studio?I always advice people not to use this function in MS. If the YouTube Servers are having a bad day, your login details will fail block the upload of your video.My workflow is to use the BMake Movie Function/B or BRender As/B function (which is the same thing) and render my video first. Once the video has finished rendering and I have checked it, I go directly to YouTube and press the BUpload/B link at the top of all YT pages.
Then you just navigate to My Documents - Vegas Projects Folder - My Project - select your newly rendered video and then the upload begins.Derek. Hi Derek.very informative reviewsthank you for doing these theyhelp out tremendously, I am using Movie studio Platinum12.0 and had a question.I have 2 computers 1 runs 32 bit and I just got a 64 bit.I started a project on my 32 bitlaptop but havent got to finish it yet(it was taking up too much ram to see the effects in preview.So I obviously want to now Use that template on my new 64bit beast of a computer but was wondering if it's even possible to pull that 32 bit template onto my new comp and open it up in the 64bit verion on movie studio? I can't give you a concrete answer.It's not really a good idea to switch your Movie Studio projects from the 32 bit version to the 64 bit version or vise versa. Some of the software code is only written in 32 bit and some only in 64 bit. So you could end up with strange bugs appearing that drive you crazy.
Basic editing cuts shouldn't be a problem to transfer, however it is the effects that 'may' cause errors.So the only way to find out is to try.The No.1 reason why Movie Studio is available in a 32bit and 64bit version, is so that people of older computers can still use the 32bit version. 64bit computing is well and truly becoming the standard now for all new computers, because it offers so much more processing power when dealing with large 1080p video files. Your System is very powerful, so that is not the problem.First thing I would try is to un-install the NewBlue Titler, re-boot and then re-install it.Make sure you installed the 64 bit version of Movie Studio Platinum 12 Suite. To check, go to Help - About Movie Studio Platinum. Also make sure you have Build Version 896 installed.Do you have Vegas Pro 11 installed on your computer as well?Please don't reply under this message, because you started a new question under another persons comment and room is running out here. Either start a New thread or reply directly to this email address help@moviestudiozen.com. I have rendering issues with Movie Studio Platinum 12 Suite, HELP!
I have AVCHD footage at 720p 23.976fps. I have edited my footage, it is clocking in at about 2 hours long. I want to put this on DVD, so my thought was to break it down into two 1 hour long sections. I set the loop selector to the 1 hour mark and click make movie, set the output to save to hard drive at the preset DVD settings and click go.
16 hours later it finishes. I have 5 sets of these to make. I can't take 2 weeks to do this.
It is a new computer, Win 7, Intel, Quad Core 3.2Ghz, 32Gb of RAM. Can I set the compression where I can squeeze the 2 hours onto one DVD? Formerly a FCP user, working for a client on their gear. Hi PatrickI have good news for you - don't panic.At this very moment I am working on some new tutorials. One of them will teach you how to Professionally compress video, of any size, to fit onto any size disc. I make a large number of DVDs all the time using this method and it works beautifully. The best way to make the BEST quality DVDs, is to render the video accurately in Movie Studio so that it does not have to be re-rendered (re-compressed) in DVD Architect Studio.
One thing I will tell you ahead of time though, is that 23.976fps video (due to DVD specifications), will get re-rendered in DVD Architect. It doesn't get compressed, something has to be emedded so that the frame rate works properly on a TV. There is no way around this, but it isn't a big deal. It just means more time is added to the workflow. 25p and 30p video are faster to work with on DVDs. Once you have the DVD template/files rendered, any further copies will burn in under 10 minutes each.Regards, Derek.